Today, 40Tech is pleased to present a guest post by Tim Millett.
Google, which has received a deluge of apps for its own devices, has obviously decided to do some lateral thinking, and its App Inventor is a sort of assembly process for apps. This is the sort of thing where you can ask your IT Support to create a business app for you, for example.
App Inventor basics
Google hasn’t missed any tricks with App Inventor. Anyone can make his or her own apps. Google has included a tutorial, which is so simple it’s like LEGO. You literally upload your app elements, set up your app and download it onto your phone, pad or computer. Simple as that. It’s a very good idea for those who really need or want their own special apps, and a money saver, too, when you’re thinking about commercial apps.
Benefits for consumers
As a matter of fact, making your own apps is actually a very good idea for consumers. Commercial apps tend to be very generalized, and some, let’s face it, are less than dazzling. Some apps, in fact, are almost 1995 level technology. The graphics may be slightly better or worse, but they’re not too impressive by any standards.
Consumers who know how to make their own apps have more choices. Google App Inventor is so easy to use that even basic trial and error will only take up a few minutes. It’s also a good way of experimenting with what’s possible.
For example:
What apps would you like to have on your phone?
· Organizer
· Appointment book
· Cash book
· Invoice
· Professional electronic data
· File sharing
Well, if you want them, you can get them. You can see how useful this sort of technology really is. An all-in-one “office” isn’t impossible, either. Many business IT support app concepts are actually based on a series of task-specific operations, and the software isn’t particularly complex.
Apps evolution and Google App Inventor
Google App Inventor is likely to be a groundbreaker in many ways. Several thousand apps come onstream every day. The world is awash with apps, from brilliant to gruesome, and the world’s major platform operators, particularly computer and phone makers, are swamped. It could take a year just to check out all the apps currently available for an iPad, for example.
DIY apps are definitely a better option for the basic things. That’s a true indicator, because the normal track record for technology is that today’s advanced technology is tomorrow’s standard open source freebie. Given that mobile technology is now part of the infrastructure of society, App Inventor is likely to be the start of a revolution.
Give Google App Inventor a shot. See what you can do, and then check out what you need. You will definitely find that you can save yourself a lot of time roaming the net looking for apps, to start with. You may also find that you can make a better app than the stuff on the market.
Author Bio: Tim Millett is an Australian freelance writer and journalist. He writes extensively in Australia, Canada, Europe, and the US. He’s published more than 500 articles about various topics including IT Support and Business IT Support.
Is Google A Monopoly?
Today, 40Tech is pleased to present a guest post by Kosmo from The Soap Boxers.
It has been 14 short years since Stanford students Larry Page and Sergey Brin founded Google. Since then, the company’s market value has skyrocketed to more than $150 billion and the company’s name has become a household word.
Photo by HarshLight
Like many successful companies, Google has decided to diversify rather than putting all of its eggs into the search engine basket. I personally use Google for:
That’s a half dozen tools that I use fairly frequently, and I’m not even a real “power user” – there are people who depend on Google products much more heavily. With Google having its hand in nearly every pie these days, have they grown into a monopoly that needs to be regulated or broken up?
They Could Put Me Out Of Business!
A friend of mine runs a successful blog and is concerned about the amount of power that Google has in the search engine space. A considerable amount of his traffic (and revenue) comes as a result of Google (as is the case for a great many bloggers). Changes in Google’s algorithms could result in his traffic being cut dramatically – costing him a considerable amount of advertising revenue.
While I can certainly empathize with my friend – since I also get a considerable chunk of traffic from Google – I happen to think that he (and others) are looking at this a bit backward. Who are the customers of Google’s search engine – the people searching, or the website owners? I see Google as the Lonely Planet guide to the internet – a travel guide to stops along the information superhighway. To take the analogy further, let’s say you own a restaurant that a popular travel guide reviews as a top choice for travelers. Suddenly, you’re booked solid and perhaps even think of opening a second location. Then, the next year, the travel guide doesn’t mention your restaurant at all – and traffic declines sharply. Can you be very upset at the publishers of the guide? Of course not – their job is to make the readers happy. Any benefit to you is incidental. It’s the same thing for Google – it’s nice if they drive traffic your way, but they don’t owe you anything.
Too Hard To Switch?
Is it too hard to switch from Google products, since they have their hand in everything? Earlier in this article, I mentioned that I use six Google products on a regular basis. How hard would it be for me to switch?
Search engine – If I wanted to switch to a different search engine, it’s pretty easy – just plug the URL of the search engine into my browser.
Email – I use Google’s mail servers for my own domain. Since these aren’t @Gmail.com addresses, I could switch by making a few changes to settings on my domain registrar’s site. I’ve done this before, and I can assure you that it’s not a very big deal. For Gmail addresses, this is more difficult, but that has always been the problem with email addresses – unless you own the domain, they generally aren’t portable. There are so many different providers of email service that it seems a bit silly to suggest that Google has undue influence in this market.
Advertising provider – I use Google’s Adsense program for the ads on my site. Google does have some competitors in this space, and I have experimented with a couple of them, and have always come back to Adsense (some of the competitors show ads that aren’t very relevant). I have a WordPress plug-in (WhoSeesAds from Ozh) insert the ad code on the fly. It would be child’s play to replace this code with something from Chitika or a different competitor.
Website Analytics – Google Analytics is one of three products that I use for analytics, and not the one that I rely on most heavily. I think it would be fair to say that I have already switched to WordPress Stats for most of my analytics.
RSS Reader – I really don’t need a lot of bells and whistles, so I don’t have much of a reason to switch to a different RSS reader. However, it seems that there is a standard called OPML that allows you to export information about your subscriptions and then import this information into a new reader.
Webmaster tools – Switching to a different provider would generally mean adding a small bit of code to my site.
In addition to being a user of these six Google products, I am also a former user of Blogger. I made the switch to WordPress back in April of 2009, at the urging of a friend who declared WordPress to be superior. I was able to easily import all of my old articles from Blogger to WordPress in a matter of minutes.
Unreasonable Barriers To Entry?
One characteristic of a monopoly is that their actions cause unreasonable barriers to entry into the market. Certainly, companies wishing to compete against Google have an uphill battle. However, it’s important to note the different between a high barrier to entry and an unreasonable one. There are many industries in which new companies face difficult barriers to entry. If I wanted to start a car company, it would be extremely expensive and quite difficult to succeed – but I can’t honestly say that Ford, Toyota, Honda, Mercedes Benz, or Porsche have a monopoly.
I even question exactly how high the barriers are. Bill Gates famously said that a kid in a garage could put him out of business. This could happen to any number of Google’s businesses as well. If someone is able to find a way to charge advertisers less than Adsense does while paying web site owners more, that would be a sustainable advantage that could be used to drive Adsense out of business. It is unlikely that any one company could completely put Google out of business, but that’s the whole point of diversification – and not the mark of a monopoly.