When you were younger, did you envision a future where we communicated with video consoles, instead of telephones? I sure did. Of course, I also thought we’d all be driving flying cars by now, too. While we’ll all be driving flying cars any day now, video conferencing still has a ways to go before everyone uses it. Skype is great, but requires a computer and the installation of software. Skype also faces some legal obstacles that call its future into question. There’s an option, though, which does away with the installation of software, and let’s you have a video conference from within your web browser. Read on for a look at our experience with Tinychat.
Setup
Tinychat bills itself as a service that delivers "dead simple video conferences without the extraneous ad-ons and inconvenience, making video conferencing an accessible, uncomplicated experience." Tinychat is easy, presenting you with various step by step selections that you click through to get into your chatroom. During this quick process, you select a name and topic for your chatroom; learn the link to your chatroom (typically the name you selected, appended to the end of tinychat.coml/); have the option to share the link to your chatroom manually or via Twitter, Facebook, or Myspace; and can control various settings to your chatroom, such as privacy settings and camera and microphone choices.
Once you’ve successfully joined a chatroom, each person in the chatroom will have his or her own camera frame on your screen. You also can text chat in the chatroom as well. The image below shows me, talking to myself between my desktop and laptop, and should give you an idea of how the interface looks. You can also view video full screen.

Quality
Video conferencing in Tinychat is easy, but how is the quality? As much as I love video conferencing with myself, I did test it with Bobby (the other writer here at 40Tech). We also tested Skype, so that we’d have a point of comparison. The Tinychat quality couldn’t compare to Skype. First, Tinychat had lag that wasn’t present in Skype. Bobby and I had to train ourselves to pause before speaking, as the delay caused us to constantly interrupt one another. Our chat was filled with many instances of one of us saying "no, you go ahead." This caused our conversation to be very halting, with many stops and starts.
The video in Tinychat was good, so long as there was no motion. With motion, it became more pixilated than the Skype video. Otherwise, the video was clear, and very similar to the quality in Skype. The above screenshot shows a snapshot of video from my Logitech QuickCam Pro 9000. The audio was comparable to the audio in Skype, and dependent on microphone quality. Bobby and I each tried Tinychat on two different computers, and the audio varied in quality depending on which computer was used. A headset is important for voice quality. Also, without a headset, you’ll be relegated to clicking an onscreen button whenever you want to speak. This is likely done to minimize ambient background noise.
Conclusion
With some of the shortcomings I experienced with Tinychat, you might think I wouldn’t recommend it. That’s not necessarily the case. For any important conference, Tinychat wouldn’t be a viable option. But for casual chats, or in situations where the other party doesn’t have Skype, Tinychat is a good choice. Some of the limitations that I experienced make Tinychat annoying at times, but still very usable. I’ll also be interested to see whether Tinychat works out some of the kinks in the future. Tinychat works on Windows, Mac and Linux, from within Firefox, Internet Explorer, Safari, and Chrome.
Bobby says:
We should also add that there are Pro options to Tinychat that have additional features that, of course, have to be paid for — such as sharing your desktop and the like. I am somewhat curious to know if the compression technology or servers are better for pro as well, which may make Tinychat an appealing option for dead-simple business conferencing. Hard to beat that “free” pricepoint from Skype though…
Oh yes — and Evan spent much of the conversation wearing funny glasses and appearing to me in the guise of alien or wizard, via his Logitech software… :P
October 7, 2009 — 2:32 am
Evan Kline says:
That’s for pointing that out. I’ll have to go back and add that info in.
October 7, 2009 — 10:07 pm
Video conference says:
Availiblity of video conferencing where other software are not available and you can simply use your browser for video conference its a great feature of tinychat and very convinent method instead of downloading software really this blog gives me loads of information.
October 7, 2009 — 11:58 pm
christie says:
This free version sounds like a really nice thing for the casual family/friend chat. I’d never heard of it. We use megameeting for our department video conferences, and while it works ok, it has many of the same shortcomings you describe with the free Tinychat.
.-= christie´s last blog ..Study: Your confidence in your own thoughts is affected by your posture! =-.
October 9, 2009 — 12:33 pm
Evan Kline says:
I had never heard of megameeting. You would think that a paid service would work out some of those kinks, with free services threatening to take away their business.
October 9, 2009 — 1:25 pm
tim says:
I did a post for makeuseof.com about How to Conduct Online Interviews where I talk about Wetoku (now in public beta).
It doesn’t totally step into tinychat’s niche as a video conferencing tool, but it majors on making online video interviews easy. They have had similar issues with pixelation but have increased video quality to fix it.
Google’s video chat has minimal lag time. I suppose it may depend on bandwidth and possibly processor speed, etc.
October 12, 2009 — 2:23 am
Evan Kline says:
Very good article you had at makeuseof.com (which I’m subscribed to via RSS). Wetoku really seems like it is super easy. I’ll keep this is in mind if I ever do a video interview.
October 12, 2009 — 12:30 pm
tim says:
Thanks! Yeah, the ease of use is a real clincher for a lot of people.
I forgot to mention TokBox as another video conferencing alternative. I tried it out with two other people and the results seem to depend on bandwidth. Two of us were working with cable speed but the other was using a moble internet connection and experienced some lag because of it. Worth a try though.
.-= tim´s last blog ..How to choose who to work on your computer =-.
October 13, 2009 — 12:05 am
Evan Kline says:
Cool! It is always nice to have choices.
October 13, 2009 — 7:15 pm
Cheri says:
I am having problems. I own a mac and i cannot get the video or cam to work on tiny chat. Is their an upgrade i need. I can’t locate it.
Thanks for the help i am a little bit of a dunce in this area :)
April 30, 2010 — 2:42 am
Evan Kline says:
I’m not a Mac user, so I’m not sure how much help I can be, but does your web cam work in other apps?
April 30, 2010 — 9:24 am
Cheri says:
yes both mike and cam work in other applications
April 30, 2010 — 6:15 pm
Evan Kline says:
I can’t be much help given my lack of Mac knowledge, so you might want to contact their support:
support@tinychat.com
I wish I could be more help, but I have no idea. :(
April 30, 2010 — 9:20 pm
Brian Parker says:
RHUB’s TurboMeeting lets you do video conferencing on Windows and Mac (well, the audio will be there in a month). RHUB’s appliance also lets you do remote support.
October 8, 2010 — 5:45 pm
Sarah says:
Hi,
Can you test FaceFlow.com ?
March 6, 2011 — 3:47 am